After manipulation (pumping heat into water), they measured the sediments at the bottom of the pond for carbon dioxide concentration. By carefully sustaining the sediments and temperature from any changes, the production of zooplankton and algae were successful. Those mesocosms contained openings underneath and were submerged at the same depth as the pond. They divided it into four controls and four experiments on University of Calgary's campus pond. Flanagan and McCauley tested the effects of climate warming on carbon dioxide concentration on shallow ponds by creating an eight-cylinder shaped in situ mesocosms. began the experiment dividing those units into categories of a control (zooplankton and phytoplankton) and 3 experiments: ( Jenynsia multidentata with zooplankton and phytoplankton), (juvenile Hoplias malabaricus with zooplankton and phytoplankton), and (Large Hoplias malabaricus, Jenynsia multidentata, zooplankton, and phytoplankton) and observed biomass differences within different conditions. Using 12 units, they filled them with aquifer water, sand and plants and kept them in isolation until the environment became suitable for phytoplankton to emerge. Three months prior to conducting the experiment, they maintained an average precipitation, air temperature, and overall subtropical environment. Mazzeo and colleagues examined the eating habits of Hoplias malabaricus fish when exposed to different amounts of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and competition. Another disadvantage to using mesocosms is not adequately imitating the environment, causing the organism to avoid giving off a certain reaction versus its natural behavior in its original environment. Using growth chambers for a laboratory experiment is sometimes a disadvantage due to the limited amount of space. Greenhouses also contribute to mesocosm studies although sometimes, it may induce climate change, interfering with the experiment and resulting in inefficient data. When plants are placed in a growth chamber, the air, temperature, heat and light distribution can be manipulated and the effects of being exposed to different amounts of each factor can be observed. For indoor mesocosms, growth chambers grant greater control over the experiment. Manipulating something can give an idea as to what to expect if something were to occur in that ecosystem or environment. Mesocosm experiments also tend to include replication of different treatment levels. By manipulating gradients (e.g., climate variables) mesocosm studies can extend beyond available data helping to build better models of the effects of different scenarios. The advantage of mesocosm studies is that environmental gradients of interest (e.g., warming temperatures) can be controlled or combined to separate and understand the underlying mechanism(s) affecting the growth or survival of species, populations or communities of interest.

Mesocosm studies may be conducted in either an enclosure that is small enough that key variables can be brought under control or by field-collecting key components of the natural environment for further experimentation.Įxtensive mesocosm studies have been conducted to evaluate how organisms or communities might react to environmental change, through deliberate manipulation of environmental variables, such as increased temperature, carbon dioxide or pH levels. In contrast to laboratory experiments, mesocosm studies are normally conducted outdoors in order to incorporate natural variation (e.g., diel cycles). Mesocosms tend to be medium-sized to large (e.g., aquatic mesocosm range: 1 litre (34 US fl oz) to 10,000 litres (2,600 US gal)+) and contain multiple trophic levels of interacting organisms. In this way mesocosm studies provide a link between field surveys and highly controlled laboratory experiments. Different components of a successful mesocosmĪ mesocosm ( meso- or 'medium' and -cosm 'world') is any outdoor experimental system that examines the natural environment under controlled conditions.

Example of microcosm